Was Muhammad indeed consistently killing people in the sake of self-defense? ”Ī rough estimate of 270 million people killed by islamic jihad over 1400 years span of time reflects muslim mentality how these number could have only been achievable through self-defense so as present day Muslims claim.īut was 1400 years of war and bloodshed a product of self-defense really?īut we can have a preview how islamic principle was during muhammad’s time to have a peek on how muslims do behave in terms of war and bloodshed. “ Jihad killed the Buddhists in Turkey, Afghanistan, along the Silk Route, and in India.
“Koenard Elst in Negationism in India gives an estimate of 80 million Hindus killed in the total jihad against India. “A rough estimate by Raphael Moore in History of Asia Minor is that another 50 million died in wars by jihad.” “The number of Christians martyred by Islam is 9 million. So, for 25 million slaves delivered to the market, we have an estimated death of about 120 million people.” These soon died since the main providers had been killed or enslaved.
“ Those who were left behind were the very young, the weak, the sick and the old.
Let us look on the casualties of 1400 years of islamic jihad how much it was estimated in millions. Muslims trying to defend this barbarity would present the concept that Muslims were in no way the aggressor but consistently as islamic principle only fight by one reason: self-defense.īut could this be a reality much so that much of history has been hidden for scrutiny? 1400 years of Islamic caliphate produced horrendous result in terms of casualties from war, conquest and bloodshed.
0 kommentar(er)
